Category Archives: History

Handbags, Now and Historically

Isaac Cruikshank (1756–1811) - "Parisian Ladies in their Full Winter Dress for 1800", an over-the-top exaggerated satirical Nov. 24th 1799 caricature print by Isaac Cruikshank, on the excesses of the late-1790s Parisian high Greek look, and the too-diaphanous styles allegedly sometimes worn there.

Earlier in the year I heard about a book following the evolution and history of the handbag. I was intrigued. I was also never able to remember or find out what the name of the book was. Handbags, historically, are intriguing to me. Prior and into the 18th century, handbags were mostly satchels worn inside your clothing. They were akin to underwear. So purses and handbags of today, are a relatively new accessory.

In high school I was always drawn to more utilitarian purses or bags, and never wanted to stand out too much, teens are generally self conscious and I was no different. Looking back I could have made some much better handbag selections. In my second year of university I had a roommate who had a huge handbag selection, triggering me to realize that I too could rock multiple handbags, and they could look awesome too.

I only consciously started looking for the perfect handbag on later shopping excursions with Katie. And there were some beautiful handbags seen on those excursions… So, I find myself looking for a new bag, the search is on, and I am nothing if not discriminating. I actually expect this to take many months.

Do you settle for any handbag, or do you stick to your guns and wait until you find the perfect one? Do you change bags weekly, seasonally, or to go with your outfits?

Want to read more about handbags and how they are truly essential to our existence as women? Read Rebecca Willis’ article Applied Fashion: Handbags, Essentially.

Image source: Wikimedia Commons

Spooky Specters – Cemeteries and Death

It’s starting to get colder out. It seems as though Katie got snow, and I believe we got our first frost here. Yesterday I stripped all the tomato plants of their green tomatoes, and gave the flowering ends odd looks, and brought in all the summering indoor plants plants. It is definitely fall here now, and next week Hallowe’en. So in honour of the holiday of candy, the season of bright leaves and cool breezes, we will explore graveyards!

First up, the historic Highgate Cemetery in London, England. This oozes a historical Victorian-Gothic-garden look and feel and I would love to visit this place. The cemetery was built in 1839 to help deal with the rising death rates coinciding with the growing population pushing past 1 million. The cemetery overlooks the city and quickly became fashionable. Notable residents include George Eliot and Karl Marx.

benleto via Flickr

benleto via Flickr

Another gorgeous, sad and slightly disheveled, photo here.

Highgate’s landscape is full of gothic buildings and monuments, filled with trees and wildflowers and shrubs, which grow without human interferences. As a result it is rich with wildlife, including birds and small animals. Its popular history includes an alleged resident, the Highgate Vampire, who haunted the cemetery in the 1970s.

Next up, the Natural Burial Movement. Has anyone else heard of the Natural Burial movement? It seems to be a newer trend, where bodies are buried free from embalming fluid, in simple plain pine (or biodegradable) caskets. The area surrounded the cemetery is naturally vegetated (surrounded by trees or meadow), necessitating minimal maintenance. I did see one link to DIY caskets that can be used as bookshelves during the interim, but I won’t be building one of those.

I personally find embalmed bodies upsetting on the viewing level. While It reinforces that a loved one is passed, it looks unnatural, which seems to upset me even more in what is already a fragile environment. I like the idea of a natural burial and a more wild garden like surroundings, but I also like the old look of tombstones.

I will leave you with a couple articles, Planning a Green Funeral of Burial by the David Suzuki Foundation and How to Keep the Burial Process Lean and Green from the Toronto Star.

What are your thoughts on old Victorian/Gothic cemeteries, or more current burial trends? Does anyone else want to visit Highgate Cemetery with me, and maybe afterward the catacombs in Paris? I promise we can hit a wine bar or two… or three?

The Bra Fitting Revolution

It seems like every time there is a discussion about bras it inevitably ends up, “Are you wearing the right size?,” “It’s probably two sizes too big,” “You should get a fitting.” Did Oprah suddenly have an exposé where she found out her bra was two sizes too small? (at least that can’t happen again, I hope.) Or did the bra industry decide that it was time to sell ladies more bras and have then second guess their current bra sizing, going for the money grab.

“8 out of 10 women wear the wrong size bra”

Reflecting back on purchasing my first bra, I do not recall a multitude of fittings, but rather gathering a bunch of bras, trying them on, and going by look and comfort. Does it feel too tight? Does it keep everything in? Does it remain invisible after clothing yourself?

When I got my second bra fitting a few years ago it was revealed I was wearing the wrong size. I went in because I felt that the wire was digging in a bit so I suspected the fit was off, and it had been a year or two since I had my last fitting, so this result was not awe invoking and a choir of angels did not sing and rejoice. The lady told me I was a 32C. But the C size of that store’s brand was simply too big (vanity sizing), and the 32 circumference felt like it was cutting into my ribcage and leaving marks. What?! I went to a larger department store that carried a multitude of the usual bra brand suspects, and found that the C part was fine with most of those bras, but I left the 32 behind, and went for the 34. Bra fitters may not be mystical creatures after all, I pondered. Naturally our body weight is in constant flux, making having a constant ‘perfect’ bra size practically unachievable.

“After two Oprah episodes featuring dramatic “bra interventions” and even a Dateline investigation into the problem, American women are embracing bra fittings.”

On a whim I thought maybe Oprah had started this new wave of bra fitting and misfittings, and it turns out she may have. It seems to have started in November of 2005 and Oprah aptly named it ‘The Bra Revolution‘ featuring two episodes on the subject. These episodes emphasized looking sexy (to some extent) and being bustier than you thought (this being projected as a positive), as opposed to what should be a practical, so some extent, and utilitarian piece of underclothing, with a hint of frilly should the individual desire. Ultimately, free bras were given away and financial profit was gained. Now every lingerie store and department store boast bra fitting services.

Oprah made the procedure sound like something halfway between winning the lottery and discovering your fairy godmother: “Every woman watching, this is going to change your life. Everyone’s talking about it. And I’m revealing a beauty secret that literally performs miracles.”

In conclusion, I do believe Oprah’s promotion of this topic has influence bra fitting and the bra market significantly, and that bra fittings are designed to help find bras and ensure proper fit, and to gain money as a result of bra fitting epiphanies.

Have you had a bra fitting? Did you agree with the results? What’s your take on the bra fitting revolution? For profit? Altruistic? Mysticism?

I will leave you with a National Geographic episode on “The Secret History of the Bra.” Make sure to check out the “Bra Facts” tab!

Katie Daily Style – Deja vu

  • Purple cardigan – thrifted
  • Purple bubble shirt – thrifted
  • Overexposed lace necklace – self-made
  • Pencil skirt – thrifted
  • Bronze loafers – Naturalizer

This is a post o’ deja vu.

First, I was going to talk about how this outfit (which I loved, btw) made me look a little like a school marm. Not necessarily a bad thing, but I’ve been down this one room school house road before.* Remember this get up? And looky there, same purple cardigan and a lace necklace. Coincidence?

Then I was going to show you how I had to dodge the birds whose favorite pastimes are waking me up at 5:30 and dive bombing my head.

But I’ve done that before, too!

So the moral is that I’ve got nothing new. Or maybe something about how a bird over your head is worth two in the bush and a stich in time saves a purple cardigan.

So there.

*The getup ended being quite appropriate, as I spent the day playing school marm in our museum’s one room school house. The best part? “Recruiting” volunteers to show how misbehaving children were punished in 1905.

Katie Daily Style – Curator Chic, Take Two

  • Black jersey dress – thrifted
  • Red blazer – Ross
  • Red belt – thrifted
  • Silver necklace – thrifted
  • “Spy” pin – museum conference
  • Black heels – thrifted

Remember when I said I had a “curator uniform”? Well, the ensemble strikes again! And I didn’t even bother switching out the blazer.

Today I went with my awesome colleague L. to a high school career fair in a school the size of one of those islands Richard Branson owns. I was signed up to speak at three breakout sessions: Archaeology/Anthropology, Education and Science.

Because I work with artifacts, specimens and the processes of those fields, but am not a specialist in any of them (now, if there’d been a breakout session on “Awesome,” no problem), I figured I’d better look at least professional-ish as a way to trick those jaded teenagers into believing that I knew what I was talking about.

On second thought, perhaps the “Spy” pin wasn’t the best choice for conveying trustworthiness.

Yep, should have gone with the “Mathematics” medal. Someone wearing those must be a genius, no question.

Overall, the sessions went really well. The summary of my talk in each session went something like this:

I’m passionate about archaeology/anthropology/education/science, but I didn’t want to be a traditional archaeologist/anthropologist/teacher/scientist. So I went into museums. Come and join us, all of you who are too indecisive/distractable to focus on one thing!

It was more eloquent than that, and I did meet quite a few students who were interested specifically in museum work. Yay! Sadly, the students weren’t nearly as interested in the fossilized dinosaur poop. Oh, youth.

This is me preventing the wind from pulling a “Marilyn” on me. After all, there are small children present.

Currently reading: The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer by Siddhartha Mukherjee, on the recommendation of the hasn’t-steered-me-wrong-yet Raych. However, I’m pretty sure it’s made me a cancer hyperchondriac. So there’s that.

Currently watching: Blame it on Fidel! I first saw this movie when The Rocket Scientist rented it as a way to practice the French he was teaching himself (darn you polyglots, how I envy your polyglottal ways!). It’s adorable, and just as good the second time around.

Femminism and the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire

Today is the 100th anniversary of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire. Not only was the fire a horrific and preventable event, unnecessarily taking the lives of 146 women, but its story plays an important role in the history of feminism, worker’s rights, and women’s rights.

The Shirtwaist

The Shirtwaist

The shirtwaist was a woman’s button-down blouse, modeled on the shape of a man’s tailored shirt with a turn-over collar and buttons down the front. The pattern is commonplace today (and also very common in many vintage garments), but at the beginning of the 20th century it presented the opportunity for a small revolution in the lives of women, and every modern woman had one.

Before the shirtwaist, women’s shirts were only one of multiple articles of clothing that impeded women. Full skirts, heeled boots, corsets, and dresses and shirts that fastened with dozens of tiny buttons (often up the back) not only hampered women’s movement, but their ability to even dress themselves. Shirtwaists, worn tucked into a skirt and topped with a jacket, were easy to put on (no assistance required), easy to wear, and easier to replace than an entire dress. Shirtwaists could also be purchased ready-made, freeing up time that would otherwise be spent sewing.

Shirtwaists also looked masculine. The style echoed the appearance of a man’s button-down shirt, and as more women entered the workforce, being able to wear a “modified men’s suit” helped women project a sense of skill and competence.

However, while the shirtwaist was an indication of increased freedom and autonomy for some women it was a symbol of oppression for others.

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory

Developed during the height of the industrial revolution, shirtwaists were produced in factories with sweatshop conditions: no safety regulations, no labor protection, and no course of action for change. Mainly staffed by women and children who worked 14 hour days and had to pay for the supplies they used, these factories had poor ventilation, bad lighting, and exits that were often locked so that workers could not leave their stations.

Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Worker

In 1909, female garment workers went on strike against several manufactures, including the Triangle Shirtwaist Company, to demand better working conditions.

Triangle Shirtwaist Factory workers preparing to strike

It’s estimated that over 30,000 workers, mainly women, marched for their rights, even as they were attacked by hired thugs, prostitutes and policemen. By today’s standards, what the workers were asking for was nothing: a 52-hour work week, four paid holidays/year, the ability to unionize, not having to pay for their tools and materials, wage negotiations, and fire safety regulations. Many companies agreed to settle with the strikers; Triangle Shirtwaist did not.

On March 25, 1911, one dropped match caused the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory to catch on fire.


The Fire

The workers, mostly young Italian and Jewish immigrants, tried to escape, but doors were either locked or opened into the room against the panicked crowd. Women began descending the fire escapes but were killed as the structure collapsed beneath them. Firemen arrived, but their ladders were too short to reach the source of the fire and they stood with pedestrians, watching as women jumped out of windows and listening to the screams of those trapped inside.

Only thirty minutes after the fire began, 146 people were dead – some so badly burned that they were unidentifiable.

The 10th Floor of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory after the fire

The temporary morgue set up so that family members could identify the victims of the fire

But good did come out of the tragedy. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire was the principle catalyst for factory reform in the United States, reform that was spearheaded and championed by women and created systems in which women were safer.

The outrage of factory reformists and labor unions, coupled with the support of the public, led New York to enact legislation to protect the welfare of all factory workers. The state system soon became the model for national legislation.

A shirtwaist pattern, embroidered with the names of the 146 victims of the fire

PBS’s American Experience produced a beautiful documentary on the fire and its workers. Watch it here.

Thoughts on feminism weave themselves throughout this story. An article of clothing that represented freedom for some women was a shackle for others, and turned into a death sentence for 146 too many. But out of the tragedy came reform that would help all women. Some history to think about the next time you wear a button-down shirt.

Full disclosure: The idea for this post was inspired by a fantastic post a colleague wrote on the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire from a museum point of view. I tip my hat to her.